Implementing Enterprise Cashiering: A Phased Approach

This guide walks through how to plan and execute a phased government cashiering implementation.

Last Updated

April 3, 2026

Pay It Forward - Teller core value icon
Implementation Planning

Category

Replacing a legacy cashiering system - or implementing one for the first time - can feel overwhelming. State and local government leaders often juggle multiple departments, dozens of revenue types, complex integrations, and staff who are understandably nervous about change.

The good news: you don't have to do everything at once. A phased implementation approach reduces risk, builds internal expertise, and creates early wins that build momentum for broader rollout.

This guide walks through how to plan and execute a phased government cashiering implementation.

Why Phased Implementation Works

In the past, government agencies have often implemented enterprise systems through "big bang" approaches — everything goes live at once. Sometimes it works. Often it creates chaos: overwhelmed staff, unexpected issues with no bandwidth to address them, and leadership second-guessing the entire project.

Phased implementation offers a better path:

Reduced risk. If something goes wrong in Phase 1, it affects one department instead of your entire operation. Issues are contained, identified, and resolved before they can spread.

Faster time to value. Your first department sees benefits in weeks rather than waiting months for a complete rollout. Early wins justify continued investment.

Organizational learning. Each phase teaches you something. Phase 2 goes smoother than Phase 1. Phase 3 smoother still. Your internal team becomes expert implementers.

Staff confidence. People fear the unknown. When staff see their colleagues succeeding with the new system, resistance drops. Peer testimony is more convincing than vendor promises.

Resource management. Implementation requires attention from your best people. Phasing lets you focus that attention rather than spreading it thin across every department simultaneously.

This approach is how agencies of all sizes successfully modernize. Clark County, WA, for example, started with a focused initial deployment and expanded over a 7+ year partnership—adding departments, locations, and capabilities incrementally as needs evolved.

Planning Your Phases

Before dividing the work into phases, understand what you're working with:

Inventory Your Current State

Document everything that needs to transition:

Departments and revenue types:

  • Which departments collect payments?
  • What revenue types does each collect?
  • What's the volume (transactions per day/month)?

Locations:

  • How many physical collection points exist?
  • Any satellite offices, kiosks, or mobile collection?

Systems:

  • What systems need integration? (ERP, billing, permitting, etc.)
  • Which are mandatory vs. nice-to-have?

Staff:

  • How many cashiers total?
  • Who are your change champions?
  • Who might resist?

Identify Natural Groupings

Some departments share characteristics that make them logical phase partners:

  • Same source billing system
  • Similar transaction types
  • Shared supervision
  • Physical proximity
  • Similar integration requirements

Grouping related functions reduces the number of distinct configurations needed per phase.

Assess Complexity and Risk

Rate each department/function on:

  • Integration complexity: Does it need custom integration or use standard connections?
  • Transaction volume: High volume means more exposure if something goes wrong
  • Political sensitivity: Some departments have more demanding stakeholders
  • Staff readiness: Some teams embrace change; others resist

Lower complexity items make good early phases. You learn the system on easier scenarios before tackling the hard ones.

Phase 1: Foundation

Goal: Get one department live, prove the system works, build internal expertise.

Duration: 8-12 weeks from project kickoff.

Selecting Your Pilot Department

The ideal Phase 1 department has:

  • Moderate volume — Enough transactions to really test the system, not so many that problems are catastrophic
  • Willing staff — People who are ready to move on from the legacy system (or at least not actively resistant)
  • Standard processes — Relatively straightforward fee structures and workflows
  • Available integration — Uses systems with pre-built connections
  • Supportive leadership — A department head who will champion success

Common Phase 1 choices:

  • Utility billing counter
  • Building permits desk
  • Parks and recreation registrations
  • Business licensing

What Happens in Phase 1

Configuration:

  • Core system setup (organization, locations, users)
  • Fee structures for pilot department
  • GL account mapping for pilot revenue types
  • Integration with one or two key systems
  • Receipt templates and branding

Testing:

  • Integration verification
  • User acceptance testing with real scenarios
  • End-of-day reconciliation process
  • Edge cases (voids, refunds, partial payments)

Training:

  • System administrators
  • Pilot department supervisors
  • Pilot department cashiers

Modern cashiering systems are designed for minimal training time. Intuitive interfaces mean most cashiers are comfortable within hours, not days — reducing the training burden in each phase.

Go-live:

  • Cut over pilot department
  • On-site support for first week
  • Daily check-ins to identify issues

Measuring Phase 1 Success

Before moving to Phase 2, verify:

- [ ] Transactions processing correctly

- [ ] Integrations posting to ERP accurately

- [ ] End-of-day reconciliation working

- [ ] Staff comfortable with basic operations

- [ ] No blocking issues unresolved

Phase 2: Expansion

Goal: Roll out to additional departments, refine processes, prove scalability.

Duration: 4-8 weeks per expansion group.

Building on Phase 1

Phase 2 goes faster because:

  • Core system already configured
  • Admin team has real experience
  • Common issues already encountered and resolved
  • Training materials exist
  • Integration patterns established

Expansion Approaches

Add departments one at a time:

  • Lowest risk
  • More elapsed time
  • Good for agencies with very different department needs

Add departments in groups:

  • Moderate risk
  • Faster overall
  • Good when departments share characteristics

Add all remaining at once:

  • Higher risk
  • Fastest possible
  • Only appropriate if remaining departments are very similar

Phase 2 Activities

For each expansion group:

Configuration delta:

  • Additional fee structures
  • New GL mappings
  • Any new integrations required
  • Location-specific settings

Testing:

  • Integration verification for new systems
  • User acceptance testing
  • Cross-department transaction scenarios

Training:

  • Train-the-trainer often works well by Phase 2
  • Pilot department staff can mentor new departments

Go-live:

  • Support requirements typically lighter than Phase 1
  • Pilot staff available as peer resources

Phase 3: Optimization

Goal: Fine-tune the system, add advanced capabilities, maximize value.

Duration: Ongoing after initial rollout.

After Everyone Is Live

With core cashiering working across all departments, attention shifts to optimization:

Process refinement:

  • Streamline workflows based on real usage patterns
  • Adjust configurations based on staff feedback
  • Standardize where possible, customize where necessary

Reporting enhancement:

  • Build management dashboards
  • Create custom reports for specific needs
  • Automate regular reporting

Advanced features:

  • Online citizen payment portal
  • Kiosk deployment
  • Mobile collection capabilities
  • Advanced payment plans

Additional integrations:

  • Connect remaining systems
  • Deepen existing integrations
  • Add new data flows

Continuous Improvement

Implementation isn't a project with an end date—it's an ongoing relationship. Plan for:

  • Regular configuration reviews
  • Staff refresher training
  • New feature adoption
  • System updates and upgrades

Agencies with long-term platform relationships often expand capabilities significantly over time. What starts as counter cashiering may evolve to include self-service kiosks, online payments, and multi-jurisdiction shared services.

Common Phasing Strategies

Different agencies phase differently based on their priorities:

By Department (Most Common)

Phase 1: Utilities Phase 2: Building permits + Business licenses Phase 3: Courts + Clerk Phase 4: Parks + Recreation

Best for: Agencies with distinct departmental processes and integrations.

By Location

Phase 1: Main office Phase 2: Satellite offices Phase 3: Mobile/remote collection

Best for: Agencies where departments are integrated but locations are distinct.

By Complexity

Phase 1: Simple cash/check transactions Phase 2: Credit card processing Phase 3: Complex integrations (property tax, courts)

Best for: Agencies wanting to build skills progressively.

By Integration Dependency

Phase 1: Departments using Workday (already integrated) Phase 2: Departments using Tyler (integration in progress) Phase 3: Custom integration departments

Best for: Agencies where integration readiness varies. When your cashiering platform already has 90+ pre-built integrations, this phasing often accelerates—more departments can go live sooner because their systems are already supported.

Managing Change Across Phases

Technology is the easy part. People are harder.

Communication Throughout

  • Announce the overall plan before Phase 1
  • Celebrate Phase 1 success visibly
  • Keep future-phase departments informed of progress
  • Share positive feedback from live departments

Addressing Resistance

Common concerns and responses:

"Why is my department last?" Later phases benefit from lessons learned. It is a best practice to transition departments with complex requirements last.

"What if the system can't handle our special needs?" By the time you reach them, you'll have proven the system's flexibility. Early phases build the evidence.

"I've been doing this for 20 years." Acknowledge your staff's expertise. Emphasize that the system will free up more of their time for where it is needed most by resolving common issues and sources of confusion, especially among newer staff.

Building Champions

Identify and cultivate supporters:

  • Involve enthusiastic staff in configuration decisions
  • Have successful users train their peers
  • Recognize people who help others adapt
  • Create feedback channels that show concerns are heard

Timeline Expectations

Every agency is different, but here's a realistic range:

Small Agency (1-3 departments, simple needs)

  • Phase 1: 8-10 weeks
  • Phase 2: 4-6 weeks
  • Total: 3-4 months

Mid-Size Agency (4-8 departments, moderate integrations)

  • Phase 1: 10-12 weeks
  • Phase 2-3: 4-6 weeks each
  • Total: 6-9 months

Large Agency (10+ departments, complex integrations)

  • Phase 1: 12-16 weeks
  • Phase 2-4: 6-8 weeks each
  • Total: 9-18 months

These timelines assume dedicated project resources and vendor support. State and local governments serving populations from 40,000 to several million have successfully implemented within these ranges.

Factors That Affect Timeline

Speed up:

  • Pre-built integrations available
  • Clean, well-documented current processes
  • Staff eager for change
  • Dedicated project resources

Slow down:

  • Custom integration development
  • Complex legacy processes
  • Organizational resistance
  • Competing priorities for key staff

How Teller Can Help

Teller Government Cashiering is designed for phased implementation — and our team has guided 80+ agencies through successful deployments.

Implementation Expertise

Our implementation team specializes in government cashiering. We've seen every scenario:

  • Small cities with three cashiers
  • Major counties processing 500,000+ annual transactions
  • Multi-jurisdiction shared services serving multiple entities
  • Complex multi-phase rollouts spanning years

This experience means faster Phase 1 deployments, smoother expansions, and fewer surprises.

100% Client Retention

Here's the thing about phased implementation: it only works if the platform delivers in Phase 1. Every Teller client who has gone live has stayed. That's 100% retention—because Phase 1 succeeds, and agencies keep expanding.

Flexible Deployment Options

Teller supports multiple deployment approaches:

  • Cloud-hosted — Fastest to deploy, automatic updates, included disaster recovery
  • Hybrid configurations — When specific requirements demand it

Most agencies today choose cloud deployment, getting to Phase 1 faster without infrastructure setup delays.

Pre-Built Integration Library

With 90+ pre-built integrations, most agencies find their key systems already supported:

  • 43 Workday deployments — If you're on Workday, the integration is production-tested
  • Major ERPs — Oracle, Tyler, SAP, PeopleSoft
  • Billing systems — Harris, Tyler Incode, CIS, and more

This dramatically reduces Phase 1 timeline when integration is ready to configure, not build.

Ongoing Partnership

Implementation is the beginning, not the end. Teller clients receive:

  • Dedicated support throughout rollout
  • Regular check-ins during expansion phases
  • Training resources for new staff
  • Proactive guidance on new capabilities

Clark County, WA has been a Teller client for 7+ years—expanding capabilities over time as needs evolved. That's the kind of partnership phased implementation enables.

Ready to plan your phased implementation? Contact us to discuss an approach tailored to your agency.

Testimonial Image
City of Miami, Florida government logo - client testimonial for Teller

"Working with Can/Am – Teller improves our payment options and streamlines our customer experience."

Finance

CITY OF MIAMI, FL
Testimonial Image
Salt Lake City, Utah government logo - client testimonial for Teller

"This effort supports our work towards modernizing our cashiering tools and building a best-in-class financial suite of services for Salt Lake City."

Information Technology

SALT LAKE CITY, UT
Sara Lowe, Clark County, Washington - client testimonial for Teller

Video Testimonial

Sara Lowe, Chief Deputy Treasurer

Clark County, WA
Testimonial Image
Santa Clara Country government logo - client testimonial for Teller

"Each year the Department gets better and better at collecting and serving the public through Teller’s technology! The successful implementation made a difference to our collections this season. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to provide outstanding service and assistance to our taxpayers!"

Tax and Collections

Santa Clara County, CA
Testimonial Image
City of Olympia, Washington government logo - client testimonial for Teller

"When we reached out to other Teller Cashiering clients, we were told they make great partners and that we will be so happy. We are ready for some happy!"

Treasury

City of Olympia, WA
Testimonial Image
Johnson City, Tennessee government logo - client testimonial for Teller

"Teller is the ideal solution because not only is it an easy-to-use, cloud-based POS system with an integration capability, but the team understands the unique needs of local government. With features like digital check scanners and other options to help reduce/eliminate the risk of data entry errors, our operations have become more accurate and efficient."

Information Technology

Johnson City, TN
Testimonial Image
City of San Mateo, California government logo - client testimonal for Teller

"Can/Am Technology’s Teller Solution has enabled the City to modernize its cashiering processes and provide the best possible customer experience for the San Mateo community."

Finance

City of San Mateo, CA
Neil Heyer, Clark County, Washington - client testimonial for Teller

Video Testimonial

Neil Heyer, Tax Service Manager

Clark County, WA
Testimonial Image
Bernalillo County, New Mexico government logo – Teller cashiering solutions client

“Software upgrades with Teller are smooth and easy. This inspires confidence in Can/Am’s development and testing processes. It is exciting when an enhancement idea mentioned to their support team appears in the release notes of an upgrade. It shows that Can/Am listens and acts on customer input.”

Treasury

Bernalillo County, NM
Testimonial Image
Clark County, Washington government logo - client testimonial for Teller

"Their team members are true professionals in every way: responsive, engaged, proactive, courteous, true partners invested in our relationship and software solution. They exceeded our expectations."

Community Development

Clark County, WA
Testimonial Image
Kittitas County, Washington government logo – Teller cashiering solutions client

“Can-Am’s Teller helps streamline payment processing with integrations and immediate data access across multiple platforms.”

Treasury

Kittitas County, WA
Testimonial Image
Lake Havasu City, Arizona government logo - client testimonial for Teller

“We were looking for the complete package, and Teller checked all of our boxes. The system is easily navigated by both end-users and system administrators. We’ve also appreciated the Teller team’s depth of knowledge.”

Finance

Lake Havasu City, AZ
Testimonial Image
Bernalillo County, New Mexico government logo – Teller cashiering solutions client

“Implementing the Teller integration has allowed 6 of our departments to consolidate the payment acceptance process, electronic deposit of check images, postings to the general ledger, and integration with our credit card processor in one system. Teller is easy to use and simple to administer, and since Teller is web-based, it has offered us flexibility to accept payments off-site when the need arises.”

Treasury

Bernalillo County, NM
Alishia Topper, Clark County, Washington - client testimonial for Teller

Video Testimonial

Alishia Topper, Treasurer

Clark County, WA

Trusted by governments across North America

We’re proud to be a long-term, trusted partner to dozens of state and local governments in the U.S. and Canada. With decades of experience serving organizations of all sizes, you can count on Teller to deliver for your residents.